Interoperability is often cited as the biggest problem for dedicated GIMP users. While the lack of these features may well be a show-stopper for some, I suspect many designers would not even notice their absence. CMYK support is also somewhat limited by default, though additional plugins can plug this gap if required. GIMP does lack the granular text options of Photoshop, along with its adjustment layers. In theory, this is a better model, as you won’t have lots of unused functionality obscuring the features you need.Īs an example, GIMP doesn’t ship with RAW image processing abilities, but this can be added via the UFRaw plugin. In terms of features, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly which Photoshop features are missing, as most missing functionality can be added via GIMP’s rich plugins ecosystem. Some may argue that reproducing Photoshop is not something to aspire to. Gimpshop is GIMP retro-fitted a very Photoshop-like interface. However, if the UI differences are a show-stopper for you, there’s always Gimpshop. It’s true, the GIMP interface is different from Photoshop, and there will be an inevitable learning curve. The main areas where GIMP falls behind are interface and feature list.Īny designer raised on the Photoshop interface, might not always find menus options where they predict them to be. It even has a few tools that don’t have direct analogs in Photoshop - for instance, the Cage Transform tool that allows to warp just parts of objects. GIMP can also be used for both Web and print design. There are rotation and transformation tools, as well as tools for scaling, cropping, resizing, file format conversion, and more. It supports layers and channels, has an advanced gradients function, includes paths and quick masks. Sidenote: Although most of these applications were originally developed for Linux, they often have Windows and Mac versions. So, let’s get to the list, and see if open source can genuinely compete with their expensive commercial counterparts. You can always donate to the hard-working developers behind these apps, and help them make them even better. I know what you’re thinking: “If I use free software, I’ll have far too much extra money!’ This is a case where ‘free’ definitely doesn’t mean low quality. The best open source graphic applications on this list are comparable in quality to their leading commercial equivalents.ĭon’t be put off by the word ‘free’ either. If you are currently unfamiliar with the abundance of free open source graphic apps now available, you may well be missing out. Today we’re going to look some of the free, open source graphic apps available, and see if they are a viable replacement. Though there are plenty of less expensive alternatives, the simple truth is: It’s hard to get cheaper than free. While the world’s best commercial graphic applications come with packed with features, they also come with a price tag many find hard to justify.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |